Scrutiny committee reject Lincolnshire County Council proposal

On Wednesday, 26th June, the Community and Public Safety Scrutiny Committee, made up of 11 Lincolnshire county councillors, rejected the council’s proposal for changes to library provision in Lincolnshire.

Save Lincolnshire Libraries member Emily Evison, who is campaigning to save Nettleham Library, was at the scrutiny committee meeting:

This meeting focused on the report on consultation about the Library Service and considered recommendations to the Executive Committee.

The Committee voted against (5 to 3 with 8 abstaining) public consultations on proposals to put in place a new model of statutory library provision, including the use of volunteers to run some libraries at local level. They were explicit that they voted against the current document being tabled, not against the idea of public consultation. But, a final decision on whether to implement the proposals is reserved for the Executive Committee, which meets next week on 2nd July. They will have a formal debate and could decide to over-rule their councillors’ vote.

Cllr Worth, Executive Councillor for Libraries, Heritage and Culture, said this was not about library closures, but a genuine attempt at public consultation. If this is to be believed, we must make sure that our voices are heard.
Whatever else we do now, we must keep this in front of the public: sending in letters or emails to local and key members before next Tuesday’s meeting.

The same department responsible for these cuts has decided to spend £10 million on high speed broadband across the county. There are decisions on spending that make this £2 million cut to the libraries easy to solve, but it is not being treated as a priority.

Decisions on which libraries to keep open has been made based on a catchment area of 30 minutes travel to the nearest library by car or on public transport. Many councillors felt that this was not a useful measurement as many with the greatest need would be unable to regularly make the round trip to the library. They also referred to larger populated areas having their libraries in tier 2 (safe library but shorter hours funded), however one councillor cited three tier 2 communities that were smaller than the town he represented (his library was to be closed). The chair of the committee was councillor for one of these smaller communities with a safe library.

There was strong feeling that libraries needed to be saved as a public service, and that volunteer-run libraries might work in some communities but was not a sustainable model across the county.

Those in favour repeatedly cited that only 1/5 community used the library in a year. It would be interesting to see how different libraries compare, but that table was not included in the 100+page document I ploughed through.

Councillors from Boulton, Deepings, Grantham, and Branston were all outspoken against this proposal and really stood up for their communities rights to a library. More wanted to speak but hadn’t made formal requests, public speakers were not invited.

Although the vote was positive, we must not think that, because of today, this proposal will go away.

Emily Evison, Save Lincolnshire Libraries campaign


One thought on “Scrutiny committee reject Lincolnshire County Council proposal

  1. We found in Surrey that, once the policy was fully scrutinised and implementation fully considered, it costs more to run a library with volunteers than it does to continue with professional staff. This is due to ongoing training overheads for between 70 and 100 volunteers (rather than a few paid staff), a central support team being required to support the volunteers and contract management costs (the volunteers will need to set up private companies and sign formal contracts with the Council).

    In addition, about half of the volunteer groups that been set up to run their library have demanded the Council undertakes building works to bring the libraries up to a good (and legal) standard to hand over before they’ll take them on. These are unexpected costs.

    The capital and operational costs of the volunteer-run library policy in Surrey have now by far outweighed the hoped-for financial benefits.

    Lee Godfrey
    Surrey Libraries Action Movement (SLAM)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s